Welcome to theustales.com.
A dramatic scene unfolded in India’s Supreme Court. A lawyer tried to throw his shoe at Chief Justice BR Gavai. This happened on Monday. Security acted fast and stopped him. The courtroom buzzed with shock.
But why did this occur? The lawyer protested a recent court comment. It involved a broken idol of Lord Vishnu. The idol stands in Khajuraho’s Javari Temple. This place is a UNESCO World Heritage site in Madhya Pradesh.
The Spark: A Controversial Court Ruling
Chief Justice Gavai led a bench last month. They heard a plea from Rakesh Dalal. He wanted to rebuild the seven-foot Vishnu idol. Its head had worn down over time.
The court dismissed the case. They called it a “publicity interest litigation.” Chief Justice Gavai suggested something unusual. “Go ask the deity himself,” he said. “Pray and meditate if you’re a true devotee.”
The bench explained their stance. The issue belongs to the Archaeological Survey of India. They handle ancient sites. “Many factors are at play,” the Chief Justice noted. He even joked lightly. “If you like Shaivism, worship the big Shiva linga there instead.”
This ruling stirred anger online. Hindu groups felt it mocked their faith. Social media erupted with debates. Many saw it as disrespect to Sanatan Dharma.
You may Also Like:
Kantara Chapter 1 Review: A Cinematic Journey By Rishabh Shetty
Inside the Courtroom Drama
The attacker wore a lawyer’s robe. He approached the bench during routine case mentions. Suddenly, he pulled off his sports shoe. He aimed it at the Chief Justice.
Guards intervened right away. They escorted him out. As they did, he shouted loudly. “India won’t tolerate insult to Sanatan Dharma!” Some witnesses saw a shoe. Others thought it was a paper roll. He carried a note with the same slogan.
The session paused for minutes. Yet, it resumed quickly. Chief Justice Gavai stayed composed. “Don’t get distracted,” he urged the lawyers. “This doesn’t affect me at all.”
Later, he clarified his earlier remarks. Social media had twisted them. “I respect all religions,” he stressed. His words aimed to calm the storm.
Who Is the Lawyer Behind the Act?
The man is Rakesh Kishore, 71 years old. He studied at Banaras Hindu University. In 2009, at age 55, he enrolled with Delhi’s Bar Council. He has two daughters.
A day later, he spoke to reporters. They gathered outside his Mayur Vihar home. Kishore showed no regret. “Divine powers instructed me,” he claimed. He mentioned his caste. “Maybe I’m a Dalit too,” he added.
He felt deeply hurt. The Chief Justice’s words on September 16 upset him. Police questioned him for three hours. But the court registrar filed no charges. They released him with his items.
Quick Backlash and Actions
The Bar Council of India responded swiftly. They suspended Kishore from practice. Their order was clear. His act broke court dignity and rules.
Outside his home, protests erupted. Aam Aadmi Party workers arrived. Led by Saurabh Bharadwaj, they carried Dr. BR Ambedkar’s portrait. They chanted against insulting the Chief Justice. Police set up barricades for safety.
Why This Incident Raises Big Questions
As someone who follows Indian news, this event worries me. It shows how religion and law can clash. Sanatan Dharma holds deep roots in India. Courts must handle faith issues carefully. Yet, judges need freedom to speak frankly.
Court safety matters. Attacks like this are rare but serious. They undermine justice. Security worked well here. However, it highlights tensions. Lawyers should debate, not disrupt.
Heritage is complex. Khajuraho’s temples are ancient wonders. Rebuilding idols involves experts. The court’s refusal makes sense. It’s not their job to override ASI.
Words carry weight. The Chief Justice’s remarks seemed casual to some. In a diverse nation, sensitivity matters. Still, he clarified respect for all faiths. This could spark better dialogue.
Extremes need balance. Kishore’s claim of divine instruction is odd. It points to personal extremes. Society needs respect for courts. Question, but do so peacefully.
Overall, it reminds us: Faith fuels passion. Law demands order. Finding harmony is key for India.
FAQs-
Here, I tackle common queries. These add clarity and help you understand deeper.
What exactly happened in the Supreme Court?
A lawyer named Rakesh Kishore tried to throw his shoe at CJI BR Gavai. Security stopped him during a session.
Why did the lawyer attack?
He protested the CJI’s remarks on a Vishnu idol plea. He felt it disrespected Sanatan Dharma.
Who is CJI BR Gavai?
He’s India’s Chief Justice. From a humble background, he upholds justice fairly. His mother recently warned against anarchy.
What is Sanatan Dharma?
It’s another name for Hinduism. It means eternal faith with ancient roots in India.
Why is Khajuraho important?
It’s a UNESCO site with stunning temples. They showcase art from centuries ago, including Vishnu and Shiva idols.
Will the lawyer face jail?
No charges yet, as the court didn’t press them. But he’s suspended from practicing law.
How did the CJI respond?
He stayed calm and continued work. He later said he respects all religions.
What can we learn from this?
It shows the need for respectful debates. Extreme acts harm everyone.
This shoe attack grabbed headlines. But it goes beyond one moment. It spotlights faith, law, and respect in India. Share your thoughts—what do you think? For more on current events, check my other posts. Stay informed and thoughtful.